Read this email exchange and when you figure out what neither I nor my loyal reader have, make a comment.
From: A Loyal Reader
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 8:24 AM
To: ‘Rick Roberge’
Rick, read your post this morning. Interesting as always!! Just as an fyi, we offer a service that …….. It is called the…….. I have attached a short presentation in case you are interested in learning more. Wanted to post a comment that talks about the service but figured it would be rude to pitch my services on your blog. I may be aggressive but not rude. Anyway, hope all is well.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
From: Rick Roberge
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 8:39 AM
To: A Loyal Reader
Is it ever not about you?
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
From: A Loyal Reader
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 8:53 AM
To: ‘Rick Roberge’
What are you my husband??
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
If you need a clue, look here .
Who needs approval? NOT Rick and his loyal reader!
Good answer, Tom! If my reader or I had a need for the other’s approval, we would have been too worried about the other’s reaction to actually type and send the 2nd and 3rd email.There is evidence of one other major weakness being lacking. Anybody got it?
OK – I’ve been looking at this puzzle for a week. I recognize the lack of NFA, but I can’t see any specific evidence of another weakness being absent. Please help me out!